Wednesday, July 24, 2019

News Today

In a modern post on the official Microsoft helpline phone number Newsroom, the company has alert Windows 7 users the aging platform tolerate from a number of grave failings including safety deficiencies and hardware limitations while reiterating all Microsoft helpline number for the platform is ending. It’s scary stuff.“Today, [Windows 7] does not meet the requirements of modern technology, nor the high-security requirements of IT departments,” says Microsoft helpline phone number, Head of Windows at Microsoft Germany.


The Microsoft helpline phone number post (originally written in German) goes into more debt actively hitting Windows 7 for its "long-outdated safety architectures" and warning any Microsoft helpline phone number users and professions who are running that they are more doubtful to cyber strikes. Microsoft helpline phone number says Windows 7 users must upgrade to Windows 10 due to remarkable issues. Image credit: Microsoft

But the remarkable beat down of its own platform doesn’t stop there. Microsoft helpline number tells that insert with Windows 7 will result in "higher operating costs" for users due to a problem with genuine and compatibility. Microsoft helpline number also warns some manufacturers are actively shunning Windows 7 and stopping driver support while the newest chipsets from AMD, Intel INTC +0% and Qualcomm QCOM +0% are incompatible with Microsoft helpline number. Microsoft helpline phone number completes this somber vision for Windows 7 by the importance that the life cycle is ending and when that happens it will no longer provide any reliability updates or technical support.

 

So should you trough Windows 7 and run for the hills?

After all Microsoft also anxiety its post that it has never been easier to upgrade to Windows 10.


What To Think? Reality Vs Scare Tactics

Let me be absolutely clear: Microsoft helpline phone number is taking exceptional liberties with the truth and Windows 7 users should not panic. Instead, they should see this for what it is - a hopeless attempt by the company to push users to Windows 10 after the infamous persecute stopped. So let’s break down Microsoft’s claims:

              Yes, Windows 10 does technically have better security BUT               Windows 7 remains a very secure operating system if you                 are going to keep it up to date with the latest security                         patches.

·   Yes, Windows 7 doesn’t reinforce the latest AMD, Intel and Qualcomm chipsets but that is ONLY because Microsoft helpline number chose to make them conflicting. In the history of Windows, this was an unprecedented step and represented to push users to Windows 10.

·   Yes, technological Windows Store apps are only compatible with Windows 10 but I’ve seen ZERO evidence any hardware or software companies are no extensive reinforce Windows 7. It would make no sense, Windows 7 is still by far the most desired and the habitual operating system in the world.

·   Yes, Windows 7 support will end and Microsoft customer service phone number will cut off all reinforce but not until January 14th, 2020. You should upgrade after this date, but it prevails a long way away in computer years.



And finally, Microsoft customer service phone number has been here before. In January 2016 the company warned Windows 7 users they choose the program “at your own threat, at your own peril”. Again technically that’s true but it’s true of almost anything (you drive a car ‘at your own risk, at your own peril’). Just two years earlier Microsoft customer service phone number gushed reliability could be found in "a modern operating system like Windows 7 or Windows 8 that has a decade of evolved reliability mitigations built-in."

The fact is this: Microsoft helpline number desires all users on Windows 10 because it gives Microsoft helpline number far greater control over updates and secrecy (in spite of important recent concessions). It also provides a strongly greater income to Microsoft via the Windows Store and native publicize. Furthermore, while supposedly no longer tracked, Microsoft would prefer to miss its “one billion” installs target for Windows 10 by 2018 by a less embarrassing margin.

Microsoft customer service phone number is making major changes to how Windows 10 handles your isolation. It's a start but does not compare to the greater freedoms of Windows 7. Image credit: Microsoft

So ultimately all this scaremongering makes no sense. Why? Because avoiding Windows 10 long term is impossible if you wish to survive a Windows user. Microsoft’s decision to make older versions of Windows contradictory with new hardware has a safe guard that, so the company will get what it wants.

As such this impatience and foot stamping only makes Microsoft’s new blog post all the more unpalatable. Yes, some of what Microsoft helpline number is saying is ‘scientifically true’, but the real-life is it’s disingenuous and misguided fear-mongering written primarily to further its own desire following the mixed response to Windows 10.

Don’t be worried by Microsoft and don’t let other, less technical, friends and family members be scared by it either. Share this post and take cheer from the fact that for the next three years Windows 7 will pursue to serve you very well indeed - whether Microsoft likes it or not…

for more info visit us: http://drzafarsaifi.com/

#facebook, #youtube, #amazon, #gmail, #google, #netflix

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Microsoft News



More racial diversity in U.S. police departments unlikely to reduce shootings: study
By Alex Dobuzinskis
© Reuters/Lawrence Bryant: A Black Lives Matter a protester stands in front of St. Louis police department officers the equipped with riot gear in St. Louis (Reuters) - White police officers in the United States are no more likely to shoot dead minorities than black or Hispanic officers, undercutting the idea that increasing racial diversity in police departments would reduce those shootings, a study released on Monday said.

The report from researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Maryland at College Park was published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


It follows a number of police shootings of unarmed black men over the last few years that have triggered protests and stirred concerns about police use of force against minorities.

Those kinds of cases, they get a lot of attention and it's right that they get a lot of attention because they're really tragic cases," said Joseph Cesario, associate professor of psychology at Michigan State University and the senior author of the report”.
"But they aren't representative of what most police shootings are like," Cesario said. Cesario's the team relied on databases of 2015 police shootings from the Washington Post and the Guardian newspapers and gathered information on the officers involved in those shootings, including their race. The dataset the researchers used had more than 900 fatal officer-involved shootings.

In the vast majority of cases, the person killed was armed and posed a threat or had opened fire on officers, Cesario said.
"We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers," the authors wrote.Instead, the authors found variances between local crime rates played a key role in predicting who was most likely to be killed by police.


In areas with high rates of violent crime by blacks, police were more than three times more likely to shoot dead a black person than a white person, the study found. But the reverse was also true, with white people more likely to be shot by police in places where whites committed many crimes, the study found.
Melina Abdullah, a professor of Pan-African Studies at California State University, Los Angeles, and a co-founder of the local chapter of the Black Lives Matter movement, said she agreed that increasing diversity in police departments would not necessarily lead to fewer shootings."It's still true what we've been saying, which is we're less concerned about the racial make-up of police forces than we are kind of the institutional racism carried out by police, regardless of race," Abdullah said.

#facebook, #youtube, #amazon,
#google, #netflix





Breaking News Headlines

Former US diplomats say Trump's Kashmir claim may hit Indo-US ties
New Delhi has already rejected Trump's claim, which he made during a meeting with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, saying India's consistent position has been that all outstanding issues with Pakistan are discussed only bilaterally. Former US Ambassador to India Richard Verma says, "The President did a lot of destruction today.
His comments on Kashmir and Afghanistan were way off the mark."
PTI PTI Washington Published on July 23, 2019, 9:41 IST Representative News Image Image Source: AP According to former US diplomats President Donald Trump remarks on Monday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi sought his mediation on the Kashmir issue will "damage" the Indo-US relations. 


According to former US diplomats, President Donald Trump remarks on Monday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi sought his mediation on the Kashmir issue will "damage" the Indo-US relations. New Delhi has already rejected Trump's claim, which he made during a meeting with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, saying India's consistent position has been that all outstanding issues with Pakistan are discussed only bilaterally. Former US Ambassador to India Richard Verma says, "The President did a lot of destroying today. His comments on Kashmir and Afghanistan were way off the mark." According to Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistan Ambassador to the US, the President would soon learn the complexity of South Asian issues.
Donald Trump deeply concerned Pakistan’s help with handing for Afghanistan and has to shift about dangled the prospect of help with what he thinks Pakistan wish. "He praised Imran Khan like he praised North Korea's Kim Jong-un. This is his standard procedure in trying to get a deal," he noted. "Just as he has not got a deal on the Korean peninsula, he will soon learn that South Asia's historical issues are also more complex than fashioning a real estate deal," said Haqqani. Both Haqqani and Verma were responding to questions on President Trump's remarks that he is ready to mediate between India and Pakistan on the contentious Kashmir issue. "I was with Prime Minister Modi two weeks ago and we talked about this subject (Kashmir).


And he actually speaks, 'would you like to be a mediator or arbitrator?
' I said, 'where?' (Modi said) 'Kashmir'," Trump said during his talks with Khan, they're first since the latter came to power in August 2018.
"Since this has been going on for many, many years.
I am surprised at how long. It has been going on (for long)," he said, with Khan responding 70 years.
"I think they (Indians) would like to see it set on.. I think you would like to see it resolved. And if I can help, I would love to be a mediator.
It should be....we have two incredible countries that are very, very sharp with very smart leadership, (and they) can't solve a problem like that.
But uncertainly you would want me to mediate or arbitrate, I would be willing to do that," Donald Trump says.

"So all those issues should be resolved. So, he (Modi) has to ask me the same thing. So maybe we'll speak to him. Or I'll speak to him and we'll see if we can do something," Trump said. Khan welcomed these remarks. "President, I can tell you that, right now, you would have the prayers of over a billion people if you can mediate and resolve this issue," he said. In New Delhi, The Ministry of External Affairs was quick to deny that Modi ever asked for mediation on Kashmir. 
"We have seen President Trump's remarks to the press that he is ready to mediate if requested by India and Pakistan, on the Kashmir issue. No such request has been made by Prime Minister to the US President," MEA spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said.
"It has been India's consistent position that all exceptional issues with Pakistan is discussed only bilaterally.

Any engagement with Pakistan would need an end to cross the border terrorism. The Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration provide the basis to resolve all issues between India and Pakistan bilaterally," Kumar said. Former State Department diplomat Alyssa Ayres, who is now with the Council for Foreign Relations think tank, said Trump did not come prepared for the meeting. "I am worried about the President's lack of preparation for his meetings, and his impromptu statements. His statement on Kashmir today (that PM Modi sought mediation from Trump) was categorically denied by the Indian government within hours," said Ayres. "Diplomacy requires careful attention to detail, to language, and to the facts of history. We did not see that today," she said in response to a question. Nicholas Burns, who served as under Secretary of State for Political Affairs under the Bush Administration and played a key role in the Indo-US civil nuclear deal, said the Indian government has been consistent for many years in rejecting the US as a mediator in the Kashmir dispute. "Pakistan is in favor. Difficult for the U.S. to consider if Delhi remains opposed," Burns said.
ALSO READ | US lawmakers support India's stand on Kashmir, one of them apologizes for Donald Trump remarks ALSO READ | Imran welcomes Trump's offer of mediation on Kashmir, says it won't be resolved bilaterally ALSO READ | Kashmir a bilateral issue between India, Pakistan; the US welcomes them sitting down: State Dept.

#facebook, #youtube, #amazon, #gmail, #google, #netflix

Usa Today

7 Common Microsoft Problem and How to Fix Them Microsoft Office Support Helpline Number  is the primary software troop and reinforce...